some people on here are totally focusing on the wrong things in that article

#1: not anywhere in that article does she talk about being "the UK Beyonce"...that is not stated by her and besides that this article has nothing to do with her singing career...

#2: she is merely stating that without a weave, the general public would say she has "good hair"...she does not state that she herself has good hair and even states it is far from luxurious...

#3: this article/documentary that was done...how is this helping her career at the moment for those who are stating she is only doing this for publicity and not just in a good cause...she has no CD out or new single to promote. this is not helping her MUSIC career at all.

#4: and as for commenters, giving alternatives to human hair...that has nothing to do with her article. she is talking specifically about human hair and from what i read it seems as if the human hair market is just as big as synthetic. in the US we primarily see more use of synthetic than anything because girls don't really go for a natural look here...it's meant to look like weave.

#5: for people stating that she is just out of line for stating that extra hair made her feel better or more confident onstage...she is just stating the truth. it's merely a form of cosmetic surgery or make-up for some people. people have no problem with ashlee simpson stating flat out she got a nose job for a non-medical reason but when someone says lengthening their hair made them feel better onstage...oh we have an issue. please, there is a certain image that will continue to sell until people start hearing things like this and realize it's not important.

#6: i doubt she is really trying to sway anyone. i thnk she is trying to make people think....PERIOD.