"…And why WON'T you find it on said document? …Cause it 's NOT her statement to the LAPD; it's NOT HER-TELLING of the events of THAT Feb 8th afternoon! TMZ's sources referenced 'said-Rihanna's-statement' and, it's ONLY-then, THEY -TMZ- refereed to Rihanna: Aggressor and Instigator. This is why Chris' defense team could 'mount a vigorous defense,' as there WAS something to mount said defense on: Rihanna becoming enraged, after reading that Cell Phone Booty call Text Message, and THEN attacking him by REPEATEDLY HITTING HIM!"

Chris didn't mount a vigorous defense. He plead out before the case went to trial. . . cause he was just that guilty. We won't find the document you're imagining because it's not there. Stop inventing excuses for why you can't uphold your burden of proof.

Even Rihanna herself said what we all have thought at some point, "He was acting like he had nothing to lose" beating her down like she wasn't an international pop sensation and like there wouldn't be consequences to his career. She flat out denies having struck Chris first in that 20/20 interview.