@Reasonable Voice -- LISTEN TO ME, there is no court, in these United States of America,that will accept ANY of what you, as Witness, Defendant, Accused or any other "party of interest" writes down on paper, if you don't SIGN IT! Rihanna NEVER signed that Cell Phone Warrant/Police Record, it's NOT a Record of her statement; it's NOT HER statement:http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0305093brown1.html
There are two signatures placed on that document, Det. Deshon Andrews and Judge Schnegg; NO Rihanna, it's a warrant, and ONLY a warrant!

I'll have to refer you to my previous post as to WHY it is important to know WHEN was the REAL-TELLING of the events of that Feb 8th/09 afternoon, and where was said events documented!
...But as Rihanna HERSELF stated and answered in that 20/20 interview, being THEN queried by Diane Sawyer, upon HER reading from said Cell Phone Warrant/ Police Record: she, THEN disavowed some of the most-damning accusations against Chris: There were NO "past instances of abuse"; he DIDN'T SLAM her into a wall; he DIDN'T choke her to the point of HER passing-out; and NO, He'd never did this before!

But to understand Feb 8th Chrianna, we must look at those WHO had a "vested interest" in Rhianna, and "Brand-Rihanna" herself. CoverGirl had a vested interest; what I find MOST peculiar and interesting, is the fact that CoverGirl discontinued running her ads when THEY thought she'd have to take the stand and testify, her THEN statement would HAVE to be read in open court. But it was "all-good" when her statement was believed to be that Cell Phone Warrant/Police Record, but when it seemed likely, she was to take the stand, and THEN have to detail her every action(s), as told in her statement, it was THEN that CoverGirl distanced themselves from her - and THEN stopped running her commercials; BUT WHY?
...It is obvious that there was/is something 'bout Rihanna's actual statement, the one she signed, that is VERY different from that Cell Phone Warrant/Police Record, enough-so, that CoverGirl, with the monies invested, wanted NOTHING to do with Rihanna when said statement was to be read - IN OPEN COURT!

But, rest assured, Rihanna's statement WILL be made-public, if her Feb 8th/09 picture can be made-public, in no-small measure, due to significant financial gain, then so-too, will her statement fetch a "kings ransom!" ..And if said statement 'put-a-fright' in CoverGirl, so-much-so, that they distanced-themselves from her, why should ANY Corporate entity THEN place themselves at-such-risk?

X,Y,"and Z" --- OUT!