@Gucci --

You've NOW proved yourself to be "untethered from reality," and have drifted in the nether-region: YOUR NEXT STOP - THE TWILIGHT ZONE! You're the 'text-book example' of delusion, neurosis and escapism!

I did ask YOU before to give station, time/date and between which program, when you last saw Rihanna's Covergirl commercial. I did go to their web site, but to ONLY see Dania Ramirez - and I must ad, she's a FINE edition to their: "Fresh New Face" - her image was prominently placed on/at their web site!
I also mentioned that Rihanna was bragging in a 2007 interview that SHE smashed bottles upside HER brother's head: http://www.exposay.com/v/27691/rihanna-violent-past-during-2007-radio-interview/
And here's a link to the actual show, search the archives:http://www.daveryanshow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=Dirt.xml

As far as "him loosing HIS endorsements," That's to be expected, even then, you DON'T hear 'bout him getting sued for a measly $30K, now do you? ...And that said, what's Rihanna's excuse? ...I'm referring to CoverGirl, and again, I'll ask: name of station, date/time, and between which program!

"Wetting his bed at 16?" Bwayayahahahahah: Have YOU no shame? ...Must YOU? I'd be safe to say, you're reaching; and I DID-THEN read, knowing that anything else you wrote @Sun, 03,21,2010 @11:16 am, was far-and-beyond, your usual desperate, nonsensical and "dreadfully-inane scribblings!"

Re: Larry King interview: So if he said that he "didn't remember", how is THAT an "exemplification of illiteracy", or even a "cry-for literacy?" Please, do tell? ...And if you'd listened - a hallmark of intelligence - you'd have read HIS explain: Mr. King, asked him the same question, no less than 3X, and it was AFTER the "third-round-of-barrages", he relented: "he didn't remember!" But why take my word for it? Go and watch that interview! If you did, you'd see for yourself! But what you didn't remember was the first 3X when he said: "Out of respect for Rihanna, I'll NOT get into any of the details of THAT afternoon!"

Moving on: Him not saying any-more than, "Rihanna cried" after hearing the song he wrote for her, in HIS follow-up Robin Roberts 20/20 interview; I'll NOW have to, bring to YOUR attention, his "Big Boy" interview:http://radiobigboy.com/?p=7009. Go to the very end of part 4 and LISTEN to what HE has to say: "I was NOT the ONLY one in there (the car) that was doing stuff." or words to that effect. And he did make it a "policy" as to NOT talk about the details of that night, a policy he HAD initially stated/announced when seen in his first public-apology video; Mr. King's continuous harassment: asking the SAME question ad-nausea, is beyond me.
...But what does he have to say during HIS interview with Robin Roberts, that wasn't said during Rihanna's interview with Diane Sawyer? ...If NOTHING-else, they were "revelations told and myths debunked", no?
1.) That Cell Phone Warrant/Police Record was NOT accurate in the telling of the events of that night; as it is NOT HER STATEMENT!
2.)Chris did NOT choke Rihanna to the point of her passing out!
3.)Chris did NOT SLAM Rihanna into a wall!
4.)There was "NO History of violence" by Chris! Mrs. Sawyer, after reading from that Cell Phone Warrant/Police Record asked her: "Was THIS the first-time he did this? Her answer: "Yes, this was the first time!"

...So there you have it, if you listened to HER VERY-OWN words, she debunked, disavowed and make-mockery of what was believed as fact and, mistakenly held as truth, in that Cell Phone Warrant, and I'll yet-again state: "She didn't sign it, that's NOT her statement!"
So if Chris had said, no, this had never happened before - you'd NOT have believed him.
So if Chris had said: "No, I didn't choke-her-out to the point of her passing out" - You'd not then believed him.
So if Chris had said: "NO, I didn't SLAM her into a wall" - You'd yet-not still believe a word of any of what HE had to say.

...But you don't have to, Rihanna's 20/20 interview was 'indeed a revelation', and out of Rihanna's VERY-OWN mouth you heard HER say that he HAD-NEVER "done this before"; that he HADN'T"slammed her into a wall" and that he DIDN'T choke her to the point of unconsciousness!
And MOST-TELLING: "No, I didn't hit him, BUT-IF-I-DID, her shouldn't have done what HE did!" When she said that: GAME OVER! ...She tried to have it both ways, she tried to "talk outta both sides of HER mouth!"

So in closing, I just highlighted the most-cogent and easily-verifiable facts that do-indeed reveal that what MOST believe to be the truth, and said events of Feb 8th/09 Chrianna, were-NOT so, and WAS-SAID THAT 20/20 interview by Rihanna herself!
And I'll leave you with THIS: "if Chris had done ALL of what was said, told, accused then why AT ANY TIME, was he EVER charged with putting his hands on Rihanna? Chris was charged with the "INTENT of doing bodily harm": Assault and NOT the actual "laying of hands on, Rihanna": Battery......