@Aunt Jackie

Sweetheart let me read you for the filth that you are worth in under 3 minutes. First, the "clear theme" of the photo shoot that Rihanna took has merely been interpreted by YOU. Here you are comparing the PHOTO SHOOT theme which you interpreted on your own, to the cover art of the single. Now sweetie, EVERY artist uses their album's promotional photo shoot pictures as cover art. That means Kelly Rowland too honey, but of course you're just going to sweep that under the rug to try to prove a non existent point. I said that at the most BASIC level, this cover art does relate to the song. I also spelled it out for your quite simply. Rihanna + Woman = Te Amo. How you interpret the theme of the photo shoot is completely irrelevant. The photo shoot in question was not taken JUST for the song Te Amo, but rather it represents a culmination of the entire album. And instead of merely disagreeing with the cover art if you didn't like it, you claimed that the it doesn't reflect the song at all. And so to draw attention to your ridiculous bias, I referenced Kelly Rowland's cover art, which you praised in another post. And your argument is what? Kelly's photoshoot doesn't mean anything, but Rihanna's does mean something, and that something doesn't exactly relate to the song.

Do you realize how stupid that conclusion is? Of course you don't, so obviously the "education" that you boast so highly about has failed you on every level. You aren't smarter than me by a long shot honey, as I've shut you down in virtually every attempt at an argument that you have ever tried to produce. I just find it funny that you stan so hard for particular artists, and would never dare say that Kelly Rowland's/Chris Brown's cover art doesn't represent their song, and when you get called out on it you make the most ridiculous excuses. Give it up sweetie. YOU FAILED.