Okay, first of all the reviews for these kind of performances suck. Actually, the reviews for a lot of TheGrapeJuice performances suck. Granted now, I am a HUGE Lady GaGa fan and I am just about in love with Kelly Rowland, but I'm not going to sit around and compare the two's success or downfall to anyone elses. When they suck, I can admit they suck. Kelly Rowland's WMA performance was near horrible (even though I liked how she worked the stage) and yet it got a better answer from TGJ than the Christina or this performance. I don't care two licks for X-trina but I can admit her performance was amazing. As well as this Katy Perry one. NOT EVERY SINGER IS A PERFORMER! The chance to perform for the VMA's is to promote your album/single. Not to give the biggest bugdetted show or be the best dancer in the world. Not ever singer can dance you know. Lady GaGa is my favorite entertainer currently and I love her over the top performances, but that doesn't mean Katy Perry has to do the same thing. She makes chill music and does what she can do in her limits. Thank God she's not looking like a fool trying to do more than what she presents herself to be. She's a singer. What happend to when singers just sang instead of trying to be these incredible human beings?