@Jesse Lopez --

Again, it's called "FREEDOM OF CHOICE"! Blame your parents (not I) if you were never blessed with a sense of wonderment and thirst for/of knowledge! (after all, RIF; in those few sentences you've written, you've managed to trip-up over your very-own logic - Kelly wants her fans 'Motivated', she would NOT be pleased!)

1.) Kelly Rowland is WELL OVER 30-years-of-age! She AIN'T No Spring Chicken!
2.) Kelly Rowland a singer...?! A dancer..?! <-- 0~o ....Bwahahahah Here she is on The Graham Norton show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pERFzmAObs <-- And mind you, they're using a reverb/sound treatment on her voice. Talk about your "long spaced-out mess," I couldn't even watch the entire 3-minutes, I now just had to take mercy on my ears! She was/is flat and weak!

Kelly Rowland is about as "stage ready/worthy" as Rihanna is.
The "Kelly Rowland recipe for success"...

1 part weave/wig (can't show that forehead, nor that scarce/MIA hairline. While those Europeans are easily fooled, here in the U.S., your shit gotta be just right)
2 parts layer-upon-layer of foundation/toner (despite what's portrayed, she has blotchy uneven skin)
1 part studio gimmickry and attach yourself to the hottest big name producer/rapper/singer. If it ain't David Guetta or Lil' Wayne it just ain't happening!
1 part HEAVY with the PhotoShop - "real is only as real" as the software makes it!

Add water and shake vigorously - VOILA..!! There you have it, Kelly Rowland in chapter and verse!
But we've ALL "been there and seen that" before! With well-over a decade in the game, watching Beyonce, she should have already been evolved into a more polished performer, singer and dancer.

ENOUGH ALREADY! GET HER OFF THE STAGE!
Return it to someone who is far-more 'worthy' - 25-year-old (stage-ready born) Ciara!

X,Y,"and Z" -- OUT...!!!