..Wait... Why now? Had Annie Lennox, since Feb 8th, 2009, spoke on/about Rihanna/"the incident"?

#ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmm..

..But it's all of little relevance; safe to say, those who purchase Rihanna/Chris' music won't purchase, or even know a what or who "Annie Lennox" is.

Food for thought:

OVER 8-million watched that 2009 20/20 Diane Sawyer interview, which was conducted just 2-weeks before "Rated R" was released; before THAT time, Rihanna DID NOT DO AN INTERVIEW. We only then saw her holding her "daily sidewalk fashionista extravaganza". What I'm trying to say is that even with those, at the very least, empathetic 8-million onlookers, Rihanna and her "victim-hood" didn't sell: "Rated-R", given her aforementioned "matron-saint-of-all-the-wronged", and the vast sums Def Jam lavished upon "Rated-R" was an unmitigated failure!

You can't have any "meaningful" discourse on/regarding "Feb 8th, 2009 Chrianna" WITHOUT investigating A-L-L the facts of THAT evening:

1.) Where they actually "together"? Or, as the pictures of them sitting together clearly shows, was Chris just 'fed-up' and thoroughly disgusted with Rihanna and being there with her?

2.) Why, if they weren't "together" did Rihanna go through HIS cell phone messages?

3.) Why THEN, as TMZ reported, was: "Rihanna was the first one to strike -- slapping and striking Brown "numerous times" while he was driving, after seeing the text message from another woman." http://www.tmz.com/2009/03/09/brown-wants-misdemeanor-plea-no-jail-time/

4.) Why, when it seemed that Chris was NOT going to take the 'plea deal' and was then going take it to trial, had CoverGirl stop running Rihanna's TV commercials? It was ONLY after Chris took the deal, which then spared her from taking the witness stand, that CoverGirl THEN decided to AGAIN run her TV ads. What could she possibly have said, on that witness stand, that would've forced CoverGirl to distance themselves from her in such an overt and absolute manner?

5.) That "Police Report" is nothing more than a warrant for the "Cell Phone Records". It's NOT her statement! Warrants are only signed by the Investigating Detective, in this case Det. Deshon Andrews and a Judge: Patricia Schnegg. The information in THAT particular Cell Phone Warrant is, at the very least, "TAINTED": coming directly from those two female officers who sold her picture to TMZ in the first place! They've been, btw, since fired from the L.A.P.D..!!! What I'm trying to ask: given all of the aforementioned, which was an egregious and most reprehensible breach of the public's trust from/of one of its pillars on which society depends: Law Enforcement - why not then did Rihanna NOT sue the L.A.P.D..?? She had a air-tight, well-documented, EXTREMELY strong case against the City Of Los Angeles AND the L.A.P.D! She alone could've bankrupted the City Of Los Angeles with that one lawsuit.

..Could the very reason she didn't want to sue be the very same reason that CoverGirl wanted to distance themselves from her when they thought she was going to take the witness stand? Because, trust, EVERYTHING then would be "fair game"...

There's just tooooo much "loose ends" to this story that's just, 'still lingering' out there just waiting to be answered.. Rihanna spoke on it, but on one believed her: horrendous "Rated-R" sales.. And Chris..?! Well..*sigh*..as Chris said during a 09/10 "Big Boy Radio" interview: "No one is going to know what happened that night."

X,Y,"and Z"