The version that I heard yesterday is different from the one I'm hearing today. Yesterday there was no beat, only a piano rift and some synths, but today there's an actual beat to ride and the lyrics are more audible and I can actually understand what she is saying. Yesterday they were just harmonies, but no distinctive lyrics. The song didn't seem complete. That must have been a tease (I had a feeling it was). I couldn't figure out why people were saying that the song was a club banger when nothing was banging; but today was a whole new listening experience. This song is not 'deep' by any means. It is careless and catchy, and quite typical for the time, but not for Kelly. This is something different for her, and frankly, she nails it.
I'm reminded why I respect this girls artistry so much. It's because she owns any and every style of music that she tries; whether it's pop r&b, urban r&b, EDM, or risky ratchet. She does it all and she does it all well. I do prefer the deep, transparent, soulful power house vocalist that Kelly can be. I hope she never leaves that girl behind. I would also love more acoustic records from her, as well as acoustic live performances. Her voice is too beautiful for those over-produced records. I'm not saying she should never have fun with a few production heavy hits, but don't forget that you are a full grown woman with a husband and a child and full circle life experiences to talk about. Sometimes, all you need is a stool and a guitar girl, a stool and a guitar. I would love to hear her take on a folk record or an alternative soft rock song. I guess I just want the versatile version of Kelly Rowland. I never want her to feel limited or forget that she is an artist and can create and try new things. She doesn't have to follow trends. She CAN, but she doesn't have to. I don't hate this not so new, new sound for Kelly, but I don't want her to get stuck here. Give the people who actually buy your music something evolutionary.

Peace out.