I think it's admirable that she's admitting she was wrong, not making excuses and apologizing. But as a side note, how on Earth could she think that Roland Martin is 30 or 40 years older than her? I got the feeling that she was trying to mischaracterize her age or maybe she has a false sense of youth. At 34 years old (35 come December), she is barely considered a millennial (she's at the end of the wide age range of that category) and Roland Martin is only 14 years older than her, which is one-half of the lower end of her way off base estimation. Maybe I'm nitpicking but it was a bit deceptive (either intentionally or based on a misperception of her own age) for her to make such a false comparison that was 15 to 25 years off.