In reply to Jasmine.

CORRECTION: Several sites are reporting there was NO prenup so Wendy has to give him a substantial payout or face lengthy / messy litigation in court where she will end up paying more, after high legal fees. The judge is going to look at the FACT they were married 20 plus years. Legally, he is entitled to a large portion of her wealth because she built that wealth while they were married. Furthermore, her self-admitted drug addictions could be a negative factor when it comes to child custody so I think she should do a 50/50 shared custody.

It might be better financially on Wendy if she stayed married to him. He had an affair and had a side kid. Okay, but you have been with the man 20 plus years. Maybe she should foregive him, ask him to sign a POST-NUP, and divorce his ass 4 or 5 years later.

https://www.newsweek.com/wendy-williams-divorce-husband-lose-millions-prenup-1393654