Don't feminists claim that it's about equality, (the famous dictionary definition), rather than female superiority or simply hatred of men? But instead of inventing new characters, writing original good and making great films with the potential to become successful franchises, they keep stealing traditionally male roles and inserting their agenda by gender swapping the protagonists. That's why we get repeated flops like the female 'Ghostbusters,' 'Star Wars Episodes , 7-9,' and 'Terminator; Dark Fate.' Why aren't feminists demanding Mills & Boone change their plots to attract male readers? Is 50-50 male to female equality only necessary in media like action films that traditionally appeal more to males?

The original Charley's Angels' had three female protagonists, so continuing the current trend in gender swapping reboots, Elizabeth Banks should've replaced them with three male action heroes who work for a mysterious female boss. That would be genuine equality/feminist film-making. Instead, we are supposed to suspend disbelief to the point all white heterosexual men are evil yet also stupid while women are all noble, intelligent, faultless strong independent warriors.

When a 120lb 5' 5" woman beats up a room full of well-muscled male gangsters single-handed, without getting so much as a hair out of place, never mind a fat lip, it requires more than the mere SUSPENSION of disbelief; it needs to be hanged, drawn and quartered!