In reply to Ughhh.

Here's the thing...people didn't talk about the show as much as they revisited the case itself. There was more talk about the prosecutor and the original case than the show itself. It told a story of something that happened to these young men, yes. It was emotionally provoking due to what (some) knew about the case...here's a comparison...The People Vs. OJ was more talked about for the ACTING that happened than the case/original story itself. We talked about how Cuba played THE HELL outta the OJ role, we talked about how Sarah Paulson played THE HELL out of the prosecutor, we talked about how Sterling K Brown played THE HELL out of his role.

The main thing (and probably the only) we've heard about this series was that it pissed a lot of people off and reignited the furry of the people with the original mishandling of the case....NOT THE SHOW ITSELF. I don't personally believe they should have been completely shut out, but let's look at the facts here.