In reply to Hmmm....

1. No, it doesn’t. You don’t know what that word means. And no one said anything about ignoring the history. Again, you do not know the meaning of the words you’re using. Because saying “the context stays the same regardless of... blah blah” Is a contradiction.

2. What makes you think that you can define what the scope of the BLM movement objective is beyond what those who created and built it have?? Do you hear yourself? We can’t specifically protest racism and police brutality because murder exists?? You do know white people are mostly killed by other white people too right? Murder is not an issue of race nor is it an issue rooted in or sanctioned by a corrupt American institution. It is unanimously understood to be a crime, even when it’s unsolved. You’re still a criminal. Unlike the police. And when you get caught, and are determined guilty, you get prosecuted. So why you think it was appropriate to compare unsolved murders to blatant racially biased genocide inflicted by the government, i don’t know, but you sound a lil crazy.

3. Again, criminal justice reform to lessen unsolved murders is necessary. So you can absolutely go out and do the foot work if that’s something you really care about. But thinking that high crime rates invalidates the premise of the BLM movement is irresponsible and unequivocally false. This isn’t a matter of different opinion. You are simply, incorrect.