Michael Jackson

Quincy Jones’ $9.4 Million Win In Michael Jackson Royalty Case Snatched Back After Appeal

Published: Tuesday 5th May 2020 by Sam

Quincy Jones has seen most of his near win $10 million in Michael Jackson royalty fees moonwalk away from him after an appeals court dramatically reversed an earlier decision.

Full story below…

In what was a courtroom ‘Thriller,’ a California appeals hearing has ruled that a trial judge overseeing the legendary producer’s fight for more royalties for his work producing MJ classics didn’t adequately interpret contracts. Hence, the Jones’ $9.4 million win in 2017 has been reversed – so much so that $6.9 million will not have to be paid by the singer’s estate.

As reported, Jones – who helmed three of Jackson’s classic albums (‘Off The Wall,’ ‘Thriller,’ and ‘Bad’) – originally laid claim to $30 million for revenue made from the King Of Pop’s posthumous efforts – including remixes and masters for blockbuster movie ‘This Is It.’

And while he didn’t receive the lion-share of the sum, the jury  at the time ruled that Jones was entitled to nearly $1.6 million for not being afforded the opportunity to participate in those remixes, an additional $5.3 million in joint venture profits, almost $2 million more for ‘This Is It,’ and a further $180,000 for foreign public performance revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, per THR, today’s reversal centered around whether Jones’ case should have even have been handed to a jury.

Check out this excerpt:

“The appeals court rules that the judge at the helm should have looked at extrinsic evidence about the contract to make a preliminary determination about the meaning of Jones’ producer contracts. Only when the contracts were reasonably susceptible to at least two interpretations and there was enough conflict in the evidence should the contractual interpretation be put to a jury.”

“The trial court did not perform these judicial functions; instead, it allowed the jury to act in a judicial capacity,” states the opinion.

The report goes on to unpack other means in which the appeals court felt their were holes in protocol or Jones’ base argument.

Your thoughts?

[Photo Credit: Quincy Jones Twitter]

Recent Posts

Normani Dishes on Debut Album ‘Dopamine,’ Fifth Harmony, ‘Freaky Tales,’ & More

Normani is strutting the promotional trail in support of her new single '1.59' and its housing album 'Dopamine.' With the…

3 hours ago

Rihanna Teases Fenty Haircare Line

Rihanna already sits at the helm of a billion dollar empire with her Fenty brand. But rather resting on her…

3 hours ago

NLE Choppa Thanks Beyonce “For Inspiring Me to Step Outside the Box”

NLE Choppa has joined the masses of folk praising Beyonce for blazing a trail with her blockbuster new album 'Cowboy…

23 hours ago

Zendaya Teases Return to Music

Zendaya is hot on the promotional trail for her new movie 'Challengers.' And while that's her focus at present, a…

1 day ago

New Video: Skylar Blatt – ‘Wake Up’ (featuring Chris Brown)

Chris Brown spent most of April riding atop headlines for showcasing some surprisingly fiery Rap skills (e.g. beef with Quavo…

1 day ago

New Song: Nardo Wick – ‘Back to Back’ (featuring Future)

Future may be busy enjoying back-to-back Billboard 200 chart-toppers courtesy of the Metro Boomin-assisted 'We Don't Trust You' and 'We…

2 days ago