The actor/producer Nate Parker has denied claims that he sexually assaulted a young woman during his time at Penn State University.

Details on why he’s had to do so this week below…

17 years ago, the performer and his friend were accused of sexually assaulting a woman after she passed out during their time at the aforementioned school.

The pair claimed that the sex was consensual.

Parker, who would go on to star in the Denzel Washington-led release ‘The Great Debaters’, was found not guilty and his friend, Mr. Jean McGianni Celestin’, saw his initial conviction overturned overturned.

Alas, their alleged victim committed suicide thirteen years later.

This prompted Parker to take to Facebook to release the statement below:

These are my words. Written from my heart and not filtered through a third party gaze. Please read these separate from any platform I may have, but from me as a fellow human being.

I write to you all devastated…

Over the last several days, a part of my past – my arrest, trial and acquittal on charges of sexual assault – has become a focal point for media coverage, social media speculation and industry conversation. I understand why so many are concerned and rightfully have questions. These issues of a women’s right to be safe and of men and women engaging in healthy relationships are extremely important to talk about, however difficult. And more personally, as a father, a husband, a brother and man of deep faith, I understand how much confusion and pain this incident has had on so many, most importantly the young woman who was involved.

I myself just learned that the young woman ended her own life several years ago and I am filled with profound sorrow…I can’t tell you how hard it is to hear this news. I can’t help but think of all the implications this has for her family.

I cannot- nor do I want to ignore the pain she endured during and following our trial. While I maintain my innocence that the encounter was unambiguously consensual, there are things more important than the law. There is morality; no one who calls himself a man of faith should even be in that situation. As a 36-year-old father of daughters and person of faith, I look back on that time as a teenager and can say without hesitation that I should have used more wisdom.

I look back on that time, my indignant attitude and my heartfelt mission to prove my innocence with eyes that are more wise with time. I see now that I may not have shown enough empathy even as I fought to clear my name. Empathy for the young woman and empathy for the seriousness of the situation I put myself and others in.

I cannot change what has happened. I cannot bring this young woman who was someone else’s daughter, someone’s sister and someone’s mother back to life…

I have changed so much since nineteen. I’ve grown and matured in so many ways and still have more learning and growth to do. I have tried to conduct myself in a way that honors my entire community – and will continue to do this to the best of my ability.
All of this said, I also know there are wounds that neither time nor words can heal.

I have never run from this period in my life and I never ever will. Please don’t take this as an attempt to solve this with a statement.

I urge you only to take accept this letter as my response to the moment.

Nate

His statement came in response to an interview the young woman’s brother gave to ‘Daily Variety.’

In it, he questioned Hollywood’s decision to support Nate and his projects even after learning of the worrying case.

Said interview was published before the deceased’s family released a statement which seemed to suggest that the unearthing of the story may have occurred to sabotage Parker’s forthcoming ‘Birth of a Nation’, and not to honour their daughter or the son she is survived by.

They shared:

We appreciate that after all this time, these men are being held accountable for their actions. However, we are dubious of the underlying motivations that bring this to present light after 17 years, and we will not take part in stoking its coals. While we cannot protect the victim from this media storm, we can do our best to protect her son. For that reason, we ask for privacy for our family and do not wish to comment further.

Your thoughts?