‘Dark Horse’: Christian Rappers WIN Copyright Infringement Case Against Katy Perry

Published: Monday 29th Jul 2019 by Rashad

Katy Perry may have ridden her ‘Prism’ hit ‘Dark Horse’ to the top of charts in 2014, but now it appears the Pop diva will have to ride to the bank to fork over some major coins after a Los Angeles jury found the song to be a blatant copyright infringement of some Christian artists’ tune.

Details inside:

5 years ago we reported Perry was being sued by Christian hip-hop musicians Flame (Marcus Gray), Chike Ojukwu, Lecrae Moore, and Emanuel Lambert for allegedly ripping off their song, ‘Joyful Noise.’

The group said the Faith-based tune was “irreparably tarnished by its association with the witchcraft, paganism, black magic, and Illuminati imagery evoked by the same music in ‘Dark Horse’.” Written in 2007 and released in 2008, the song received a 2008 Gospel Music Association Dove Award nomination for the best rap/hip-hop song.

Now, just a week after Perry and producer Dr. Luke took the stand to defend their innocence, a jury has handed down a guilty verdict.


Monday’s decision returned by a nine-member federal jury in a Los Angeles courtroom came five years after Marcus Gray and two co-authors first sued alleging “Dark Horse” stole from “Joyful Noise,” a song Gray released under the stage name Flame.

The case now goes to a penalty phase, where the jury will decide how much the plaintiffs are owed for copyright infringement.

Gray’s attorneys argued that the beat and instrumental line featured through nearly half of “Dark Horse” are substantially similar to those of “Joyful Noise.”

“Dark Horse,” a hybrid of pop, trap and hip-hop sounds that was the third single of Perry’s 2013 album “Prism,” spent four weeks atop the Billboard Hot 100 in early 2014, and earned Perry a Grammy nomination.

Perry’s attorneys argued that the song sections in question represent the kind of simple musical elements that if found to be subject to copyright would hurt music and all songwriters.

Your thoughts?


Posted under:

Comments 10

Please Post Your Comments & Reviews

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Carlitos July 30, 2019

    Lame. They’re just bitter because their song wasn’t as popular. Greed will make you do some crazy things. Katy and Co repeatedly said that they never heard of the song until the lawsuit, which I believe. If Flame’s song was really that recognizable in the first place, as they claimed, why would anyone risk taking an underlining beat from it? I can see the similarities, but to say that it was ripped off, that’s a HUGE reach. And it’s sad that the decision was in the hands of individuals that had zero idea what any of it meant.

    • Jasmine July 30, 2019

      Shut it. That white Trash demon knew she was stealing. She had a legal duty to inform her label the track constitutes copyright infringement and her label has a duty to research the copyright.

      • Carlitos July 30, 2019

        Stfu, you don’t even know what your ghetto ass is saying.

    • Skarr July 30, 2019

      Ok, Law and Order. Katy and her team will pay up and that’s that.

    • SNF July 30, 2019

      Girl shut up lol

  2. Tyty July 30, 2019

    Hold up Katy took a Christian song and turned it demonic? Wow the audacity of it all. Welp looks like Satan ain’t f****** with her no more she couldn’t buy a hit dong if she tried ??

    • Repo July 30, 2019

      Good for her ass??

    • Carlitos July 30, 2019

      She’s still doing better than you ?

  3. SNF July 30, 2019

    Glad justice was served… I hate a thief…

  4. Ropeburn July 31, 2019

    She better appeal this crap ruling.

Recommended Posts